Pages

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Richard is Satan so Shakespeare was probably Mormon

I now understand what Bevington was talking about when he said that Shakespeare took the liberty to condense history in Richard III. So far, If I understand correctly, within a couple of days Richard has murdered his brother, proposed to Lady Anne (he killed her husband and father-in-law within a week I'm guessing since the scene takes place next to a fresh corpse), King Edward IV died, Hastings has been beheaded, three men have been sentenced by Richard, and Prince Edward has come to take the crown. What a week!

Richard's ability to manipulate Lady Anne into marrying him is very puzzling to me. After reading the scene I was not convinced by the dialogue that he had succeeded in seducing her, there had to be something else going on. I was very curious to see if viewing a performance of the scene would change my mind, and lo and behold Mandy posted the clip!


But I still don't think there was any romance in the scene. I see pity, fear, and selfishness on both their parts. Mandy, David and I discussed via IntenseDebate that women during that time in history were only powerful through royalty or their husband's title. While self interest is a motivator for Richard, it could be a motivator for Lady Anne, as well. I also think that Lady Anne knew well the evils Richard had done and could do and she saw this "giving in" as a way to protect herself. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer, right? Also, does anyone else notice how pitiful Richard is in that scene? How much of that is an act and how much of that is a glimpse into the pathetic, cowardly man he truly is? I have to admit that this makes me think of the scripture about Satan in 2 Nephi: 24--

16They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and shall consider thee, and shall say: Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms?

  1. This evil, crippled man destroys so many lives, manipulates people into throwing away their principles, exudes greed, and with one lie after another climbs his way to rule a kingdom? By no means do I intend for this to be a sermon, but it's something to think about.

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
I don't know if "seducing" is the right word. It's only after he pretends to regret killing her husband that she agrees to be engaged. He's all melodramatic, giving her a dagger to kill him, offering to kill himself, telling her over and over that the only reason he killed her husband was for her beauty. I agree that there's no romance in the scene and also that it's important to think contextually: how women needed a husband to get by and retain status, like you said in your post. Thanks for posting that clip! It looks like a very interesting interpretation of the play.
Reply
1 reply · active 740 weeks ago
Yeah, "seducing" doesn't seem like the right word. Taken out of context you would assume asking someone to marry you after killing their husband would take some sort of lustful taunt, but this is definitely not the case.
Reply
I totally love the title of this post! (I know I told you that in class, but I figured I'd comment on it as well). I also really appreciated watching the scene, because when I read it, it had seemed a bit odd to me too. I like your insights on it; good food for thought.
Reply
I forgot about how women were essentially powerless back then. So come to think about it, I think I would have married Richard also, that way revenge would be way easier. Too bad she didn't attempt to plot some revenge.
Reply

Comments by